George A. Sprecace M.D., J.D., F.A.C.P. and Allergy Associates of New London, P.C.
www.asthma-drsprecace.com
Dr. Sprecace's Home Page...
Information categories at this site...
About Dr. Sprecace and this site...
Access related links...
Terms for usage of this site...


The Involved Citizen - Common Sense Revisited

> Abortion, Morality, and Ethics <

Please visit the following website and other Asthma-DrSprecace.Com pages for excellent and up-to-the-minute daily news and commentary regarding this vital issue and all the legal and political activity going on.  And please ACT on the information that you gain here.  Thank you.  GS

www.lifenews.com

> The Catholic Church <

Physician-Patient Spirituality

An important statement by one of the Church's clearest spokesmen.  GS

==================================================
ZENIT, The world seen from Rome
News Agency
==================================================

Archbishop Chaput Revisits Notre Dame Controversy
Says Cardinal Cottier May Have Underestimated Gravity

ROME, OCT. 7, 2009 (Zenit.org).- An article written by a top Vatican theologian may have missed the mark and underestimated the "gravity" of the decision made by the University of Notre Dame last spring to invite President Barack Obama to speak at commencement, says the archbishop of Denver.

Archbishop Charles Chaput said this in an article appearing Tuesday in the Italian daily Il Foglio.

The article, published in full by the Catholic News Agency, directly addressed an essay written by Cardinal Georges Cottier, a retired theologian of the Pontifical Household, and published in July by the Catholic magazine 30 Days.

Cardinal Cottier's article downplayed the disagreement voiced publicly by more than 80 bishops and 300,000 laypeople in the weeks leading up to the president's scheduled address, and praised Obama for what he termed his "humble realism."

"Regrettably and unintentionally, Cardinal Cottier's articulate essay undervalues the gravity of what happened at Notre Dame," Archbishop Chaput affirmed. "It also overvalues the consonance of President Obama's thinking with Catholic teaching."

The archbishop, noting that he speaks for himself, and not for all U.S. bishops, acknowledged that Cardinal Cottier's essay "made a valuable contribution to Catholic discussion of the new American president."

"Our faith connects us across borders," he added. "What happens in one nation may have an impact on many others. World opinion about America's leaders is not only appropriate; it should be welcomed."

Point of departure

The archbishop explained that the outcry against Obama's appearance at Notre Dame had less to do with a personal attack than a very real and fundamental disagreement with the president's "views on vital bioethical issues, including but not limited to abortion, differ sharply from Catholic teaching."

"Much is made, in some religious circles, of the President's sympathy for Catholic social teaching," the prelate explained. "But defense of the unborn child is a demand of social justice. There is no 'social justice' if the youngest and weakest among us can be legally killed. Good programs for the poor are vital, but they can never excuse this fundamental violation of human rights."

Archbishop Chaput also explained that the timing and nature of the invitation caused the conflict: "At a time when the American bishops as a body had already voiced strong concern about the new administration's abortion policies, Notre Dame not only made the president the centerpiece of its graduation events, but also granted him an honorary doctorate of laws -- this, despite his deeply troubling views on abortion law and related social issues."

But the "real source of Catholic frustration," said Archbishop Chaput, was that Notre Dame "ignored and violated the guidance of America's bishops" in a 2004 document that "urged Catholic institutions to refrain from honoring public officials who disagreed with Church teaching on grave matters."

"Thus, the fierce debate in American Catholic circles this spring over the Notre Dame honor for Mr. Obama was not finally about partisan politics," he explained. "It was about serious issues of Catholic belief, identity and witness -- triggered by Mr. Obama's views -- which Cardinal Cottier, writing from outside the American context, may have misunderstood."

Common connection

Archbishop Chaput also commented on the connection Cardinal Cottier made in his article between "President Obama's frequently stated search for political 'common ground' and the Catholic emphasis on pursing the 'common good.'"

"These goals -- seeking common ground and pursuing the common good -- can often coincide," the archbishop noted. "But they are not the same thing. They can sharply diverge in practice.

"So-called common ground abortion policies may actually attack the common good because they imply a false unity; they create a ledge of shared public agreement too narrow and too weak to sustain the weight of a real moral consensus. The common good is never served by tolerance for killing the weak -- beginning with the unborn."

Finally, the archbishop praised Cardinal Cottier for reminding "his readers of the mutual respect and cooperative spirit required by citizenship in a pluralist democracy."

"But pluralism is never an end in itself," Archbishop Chaput noted. "It is never an excuse for inaction.

"As President Obama himself acknowledged at Notre Dame, democracy depends for its health on people of conviction fighting hard in the public square for what they believe -- peacefully, legally but vigorously and without apologies."

Offerings by George A. Sprecace M.D., J.D.:

Since March 18, 2006, I have been involved in an effort, posted below and entitled POINT AND COUNTERPOINT, to discuss vital issues of abortion, morality and ethics which are intrinsic to our Judeo-Christian Faith and also involve the Faith of Islam.  This has been an effort to fill a palpable gap in the dialogue between the Catholic Church hierarchy and its Laity, the Body of the Church.  A production of 40 offerings, it was originally graciously embraced by our local Pastor.  It was then deferred to the Diocese of Norwich, where it was soon rebuffed and then totally ignored since last Winter, despite multiple efforts to engage the Bishop in personal dialogue.  My efforts to engage the other Bishops of Connecticut and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops have also failed.  Only the Secretary to the Papal Nuncio sent a reply expressing concern.  This is a source of deep disappointment for me, but especially for my Church. 
 
Therefore, the POINT AND COUNTERPOINT series is hereby suspended.  I will personally continue to offer my help to an organization in great need of help.  But one of Murphy's Law's states: "In an organization, deal only with the person at the lowest rung or the highest rung of the ladder".  Thus, henceforth I will work only with the good parish priests...and with my Lord Jesus.  But I have offered the Church hierarchy my best effort, which follows immediately below, at the diagnosis and a treatment program for their current ills.   GS

What's Right with the Catholic Church #20, GS

What's Right with the Catholic Church #19, GS

What's Wrong and Right with the Catholic Church #18, GS

What's Wrong and Right with the Catholic Church #17, GS

What's Wrong and Right with the Catholic Church #16, GS

What's Wrong and Right with the Catholic Church #15, GS

What's Wrong and Right with the Catholic Church #14, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church #13, GS

What's Wrong and Right with the Catholic Church #12, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church #11, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church #10, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church #9, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church #8, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church #7, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church #6, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church #5, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church #4, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church #3, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church #2, GS

What's Wrong with the Catholic Church, GS

Rapid Response Posting for April 12, 2009, GS

Rapid Response Posting for January 11, 2009, GS

"The Stem Cell Research Issue"

by George A. Sprecace, M.D., J.D., The Day, TBD

"Stem Cell Issues Need More Debate: It's Abortion Wearing A Pretty Face"
by George A. Sprecace, M.D., J.D., The Day, Sunday, July 29, 2001

"Science Refutes Legal  'Roe v. Wade'  Ruling"
by George A. Sprecace, M.D., J.D., The Day, Wednesday, February 5, 2003

Human Clones?  Although the writer of the following article sounds like he may have no problem with abortion ("Stem-cell research, or therapeutic cloning, does not create a human life, does not create a sentient creature at all."), he provides vital information and insight into the latest  - and most serious - deviant scientific activity that society will have to deal with
GS

Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Abortion with a Friendly Face, GS

The Reality of the Child in the Womb, GS


The following is a good recently published resource regarding one of the most thorny issues of them all: the ethical care of the permanently unconcious patient (ie. "persistent vegetative state").  GS

Point and Counterpoint: Abortion and Alternatives

Article 1, for Sunday, March 18, 2006
Abortion and Alternatives
Article 2, for Sunday, April 2, 2006
What Abortion Is Not
Article 3, for Sunday, April 9, 2006
Alternatives To Abortion: Abstinence
Article 4, for Sunday, April 23, 2006
Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Article 5, for Sunday, April 30, 2006
Abortion And Alternatives: The Good, The Bad And The Ugly
Article 6, for Sunday, May 7, 2006
Some Background For End Of Life Discussions
Article 7, for Sunday, May 14, 2006
“After The Fact”: Post-Abortion Assistance to Women And Men
Article 8, for Sunday, May 21, 2006
Food And Hydration
Article 9, for Sunday, June 4, 2006
End Of Life Issues…So, What Do We Do?
Article 10, for Sunday, June 11, 2006
Of This And That…Here And Abroad
Article 11, for Sunday, June 18, 2006
Alternatives To Abortion: Adoption
Article 12, for Sunday, June 25, 2006
Euthanasia – Physician Assisted Suicide
Article 13, for Sunday, July 2, 2006
The Good, The Bad And The Ugly…A Sequel
Article 14, for Sunday, July 9, 2006
Palliative Sedation
Article 15, for Sunday, July 16, 2006
A Review…And Questions About Grey Areas
Article 16, for Sunday, August 20, 2006
Stem Cells – The Focus Of Much Research and “Hype”
Article 17, for Sunday, August 27, 2006
The Good, The Bad And The Ugly
Article 18, for Sunday, September 3, 2006
Politics And Stem Cells
Article 19, for Sunday, October 1, 2006
Respect For Life
Article 20, for Sunday, October 29, 2006
Respect For Life Issues
Article 21, for Sunday, November 26, 2006
The Election, And The U.S. Catholic Bishops’ Conference
Article 22, for Sunday, December 31, 2006
The Past – And The Future
Article 23, for Sunday, January 28, 2007
Faith…And Religions
Article 24, for Sunday, February 25, 2007
A Brief Summary Of Jewish Medical Ethics: Rabbi Carl Astor
Article 25, for Sunday, March 25, 2007
Protestantism: Dr. Robert H. Bartlett
Article 26, for Sunday, May 20, 2007
Islam: Altaf Rasool, M.D.
Article 27, for Sunday, June 3, 2007
Islam: Mahmoud N. Mansour, Imam of New London Islamic Center
Article 28, for Sunday, June 24, 2007
Capital Punishment – The Death Penalty
Article 29, for Sunday, July 29, 2007
Clarification Of The Doctrine Of The Church Regarding Other Religions
Article 30, for Sunday, October 14, 2007
The Death Penalty: Politics, Economics and Morality
Article 31, for Sunday, November 25, 2007
Immigration: A Crisis All Immigrants And Citizens Share
Article 32, for Sunday, January 6, 2008
New Advances In Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Article 33, for Sunday, February 2, 2008
Sexual Orientation: Religion And Science
Article 34, for Sunday, March 9, 2008
Gay Marriage, or Civil Union, or What?
Article 35, for Sunday, May 25, 2008
Human Reproduction, Catholic Morality, and The “Plan B” Morass
Article 36, for Sunday, July 13, 2008
Catholics, Church, and Communication: "What we have here is a failure to communicate"
Article 37, for Sunday, August 31, 2008
Cross Not Optional, Says Benedict XVI - ZENIT News Agency
Article 38, for Sunday, September 7, 2008
History of Church Teaching on Abortion;
US Bishops Issue Fact Sheet - ZENIT News Agency
Article 39, for Sunday, September 21, 2008
When Human Life Begins: Science, not politics or
religion
Article 40, for Sunday, October 26, 2008





More Relevant Offerings:

"Cardinal: Let's At Least Make Abortion Rarer", ZENIT News Agency

"Intolerable Secularists", ZENIT News Agency


"The Hopeful Future in Bioethics", ZENIT News Agency


"Bioethicist Warns of Overreach...", ZENIT News Agency

"Human Embryos Not Objects, Say Europe's Bishops", ZENIT News Agency

"Biology's Chernobyl,"
        by Matt Ridley, WSJ Tuesday December 31, 2002, Opinion, p A14."

The "National Organization of Women (NOW)" recently announced that the election cycle for 2004 will prominently include a pitched battle to preserve abortion rights for women (i.e., killing their offspring) under the continuing cynical rubric "choice".  Whose Choice?  As in many other spheres of public interest, these "liberals" continue their articulate, arrogant and asinine assault on a moral nation.  The editorial  listed below is a further call to battle.  OK, let's have at it!
GS

"The War Against Women,"
        New York Times, Jan. 12, 2003, Editorial, p.14

"Bush Declares Sanctity of Human Life Day,"
        Yahoo News, January 15, 2003

"Vatican Urges Catholic Politicians To Vote With Church,"
        by Victor L. Simpson, The Day, Jan 17, 2003

"VaticanCalls Catholic Politicians Into Line,"
        by Philip Pullella, Reuters, January 16, 2003

"Baby-Saving Made Easy,"
        by John Leo

Partial Birth Abortion...Infanticide -
"Partial-Sense Decision,"
        by John Leo


Copyright Notice (c) Copyright 1999-2010, Allergy Associates of New London, PC